Career · Wales

NPQH Is a Legal Requirement for Headship in Wales

Wales requires every newly appointed permanent headteacher to hold NPQH — a statutory condition under the Head Teachers' Qualifications and Registration (Wales) Regulations 2005. England made the same qualification mandatory in 2004 and revoked the requirement in 2012. The regulations, the divergence, and the current Welsh route via Dysgu.

TP TeacherPay Updated 18 September 2026 17 min read

Independent guidance, not affiliated with the DfE, Teachers' Pensions or any teaching union.

Short answer

In Wales, holding NPQH is not a strong expectation or a competitive advantage — it is a legal precondition of appointment. The Head Teachers' Qualifications and Registration (Wales) Regulations 2005 (WSI 2005/1227, in force from 1 September 2005) require a person appointed as a head teacher on or after that date to hold the National Professional Qualification for Headship in Wales or a recognised equivalent, and Welsh Government guidance states flatly that it is a statutory requirement for all newly appointed permanent headteachers. England made NPQH mandatory on the same basis from 1 April 2004 — and then revoked the requirement on 8 February 2012, handing the decision to individual schools. That divergence has now run for fourteen years. The Welsh route today goes through the National Aspiring Headteacher Development Programme and then an 18-month NPQH delivered by Dysgu, the national body that replaced NAEL from 1 September 2025.

Our pathway to headship guide is careful, repeatedly and correctly, to say that NPQH is not a strict legal requirement in England — that it has become an effectively expected credential which many local authorities, dioceses and trusts treat as near-essential, without any absolute legal rule requiring it. Every word of that is accurate for England.

Cross the Severn and it is simply false. In Wales there is an absolute legal rule requiring it, it has been in force continuously for over twenty years, and it is written into a Welsh statutory instrument that names the qualification. This is one of the sharpest single-sentence divergences between the two education systems, and because almost all UK headship coverage is written from England it is barely discussed.

The finding: a legal gate England removed

Both nations arrived at the same policy at the same time. In 2003–04 the UK government made NPQH a mandatory prerequisite for first-time headship. Then, in 2012, England changed its mind, revoked the requirement, and recast NPQH as a voluntary qualification schools might or might not value. Wales did not follow. It kept the mandate, made its own Welsh instrument, and has since reviewed and redesigned the qualification twice while leaving the requirement itself untouched.

So the comparison is not "one nation has a qualification the other doesn't". Both have NPQH. The difference is what it is: in Wales a licence, in England a credential.

Wales: a licence

A newly appointed permanent headteacher must hold NPQH in Wales or a recognised equivalent. A governing body cannot appoint someone without it, however impressive. The qualification is a legal condition of the post, and the route to it — the Aspiring Headteacher programme, then an 18-month NPQH delivered by Dysgu — is a national pathway rather than a market of providers.

England: a credential

NPQH is one of a suite of National Professional Qualifications, taken voluntarily, funded on varying terms, and valued by employers to whatever degree they choose. Some trusts and dioceses treat it as effectively essential; others appoint heads without it. The decision on what a head should hold sits with the school, which is exactly what the 2012 revocation intended.

The regulations that create the requirement

The instrument is the Head Teachers' Qualifications and Registration (Wales) Regulations 2005, Welsh Statutory Instrument 2005 No. 1227 (W. 85), which came into force on 1 September 2005. The enabling powers are in the Education Act 2002 — sections 134, 135, 145(1) and (2) and 210(7) — which give the power both to require head teachers to hold a specified qualification and to require them to register with the relevant registration body.

It is a short instrument with six regulations, and three of them do the work.

Reg 3

The Headship Qualification

Regulation 3 defines what counts. The qualification is the National Professional Qualification for Headship in Wales, or the equivalent qualification in England, Scotland or Northern Ireland, or a qualification recognised as having equivalent effect under the applicable recognition rules. So the requirement is not parochial — a qualification earned elsewhere in the UK is within scope on the face of the regulation.

Reg 4

The requirement to be qualified

Regulation 4 imposes the requirement itself: a person appointed as head teacher must hold the headship qualification, and must be a qualified teacher or hold an equivalent qualification. Two gates, not one. QTS alone is not enough for headship in Wales, and NPQH alone is obviously not either.

Reg 5

The requirement to be registered

Regulation 5 requires registration with the relevant registration body — originally the General Teaching Council for Wales, whose registration functions are now held by the Education Workforce Council. This is the same registration that every Welsh teacher must hold, and which an NQT must have before statutory induction can even begin. There is no English equivalent: England abolished the GTCE in 2012 and maintains no register.

Reg 1 and 6

Two important limits

Regulation 1 makes the requirement prospective only: it applies to those appointed as head teacher after commencement, and does not disturb heads appointed before 1 September 2005. Regulation 6 excludes acting head teachers from the qualification requirement altogether — the single most practically significant carve-out in the instrument, discussed below.

'Statutory requirement' means what it says here

A lot of education writing uses "statutory" loosely, to mean "in official guidance" or "in a code of practice somebody must have regard to". That is not what is going on here. This is a statutory instrument made under primary legislation, laid before the National Assembly, imposing a condition on who may be appointed to a specific post. Welsh Government guidance on Hwb restates it in terms: in Wales it is a statutory requirement for all newly appointed permanent headteachers to hold the NPQH. Compare England's SEND Code of Practice saying a SENCo "will be most effective… if they are part of the school leadership team" — that is guidance language. This is not.

What "since 2004" actually refers to

You will see the Welsh requirement dated to 2004, and you will see it dated to 2005. Both are defensible and it is worth untangling, because the confusion obscures the actual story.

DateWhat happened
2003The Education (Head Teachers' Qualifications) (England) Regulations 2003 are made, requiring first-time heads of maintained and non-maintained special schools to hold NPQH before appointment
1 April 2004NPQH becomes a mandatory requirement for newly appointed head teachers across England and Wales
1 September 2005The Head Teachers' Qualifications and Registration (Wales) Regulations 2005 come into force, requiring those appointed as head teacher on or after that date to hold the NPQH in Wales or an equivalent in England, Scotland or Northern Ireland, and to be registered
8 February 2012England revokes its requirement. The 2003 Regulations are repealed by the Education (Head Teachers' Qualifications) (England) (Revocation) Regulations 2012
2012 onwardsWales keeps its requirement. The two systems diverge and remain divergent
1 September 2025Dysgu becomes operational and takes over delivery of NPQH in Wales from NAEL

So "mandatory since 2004" is right about when the mandate began and slightly imprecise about which instrument now creates it. The Welsh Regulations of 2005 are the operative law, and they have been in force continuously since. What genuinely matters is not the start date but the non-event: Wales did nothing in 2012, and doing nothing turned a shared UK policy into a national divergence that has now lasted longer than the period of agreement did.

8 Feb 2012

The date England revoked the NPQH requirement — Wales's has never been revoked

How England unpicked it in 2012

The English revocation is worth understanding on its own terms, because it was a considered policy choice rather than a technical tidy-up, and the reasoning explains why the two nations are unlikely to reconverge.

The Education (Head Teachers' Qualifications) (England) (Revocation) Regulations 2012 came into force on 8 February 2012. The revocation followed an extensive review of the qualification announced in the Schools White Paper of November 2010. The stated effect was to transfer to schools the responsibility for deciding what qualifications a prospective head teacher should hold, in line with a wider government policy of giving schools greater autonomy and decision-making powers. A redesigned, more rigorous NPQH was launched in spring 2012, with the intention of positioning it as the qualification of choice for all schools including academies and free schools.

That last clause is the key to the whole thing. England was, in 2012, in the middle of mass academisation. Academies are not bound by regulations of this kind, so a mandatory qualification for maintained-school heads was becoming a rule that applied to a shrinking share of schools — and one that sat awkwardly with the autonomy argument being made everywhere else. Making NPQH voluntary-but-excellent was a coherent response to that situation.

Wales was in no such situation, and still is not. Wales has no academies. Every maintained school in Wales is bound by the same framework, so a mandatory headship qualification applies to the entire school system without exception or anomaly. The structural precondition that made England's requirement awkward simply does not exist in Wales — which is probably a better explanation of the divergence than any difference of educational philosophy.

How our England headship guide frames it — and why that framing is right for England

Our pathway to headship guide says that NPQSL and NPQH are not strict legal prerequisites for Assistant Head, Deputy Head or Headteacher appointments, that many employers treat them as an effectively expected credential in practice even where not a hard legal rule, and that there is no absolute legal rule requiring NPQH. That guide is about England and that framing is exactly correct for England — indeed it is more careful than most coverage, which often implies a requirement that does not exist.

Read across to Wales and each of those sentences inverts:

PropositionEnglandWales
Is NPQH a strict legal requirement for headship?No — revoked 8 February 2012Yes — WSI 2005/1227, regulation 4
Can a governing body appoint a head without it?Yes, lawfullyNo, for a substantive permanent appointment
Who decides what a head must hold?The school or trustThe Welsh Ministers, by regulation
Is the qualification nationally delivered?No — a market of DfE-approved providersYes — Dysgu, with regional partners
Is a prior aspiring-heads programme required?NoIn practice yes — the National Aspiring Headteacher Development Programme
Are acting heads covered?n/aNo — expressly excluded by regulation 6
Programme lengthDfE describes NPQH as 12–22 months including assessment18 months

NAEL is now Dysgu

If you looked into Welsh headship even two years ago, the body you encountered was the National Academy for Educational Leadership — NAEL, which also traded as National Leadership Wales. It no longer runs this.

Dysgu became operational on 1 September 2025 as the national professional learning and leadership body for maintained schools and settings in Wales. It did not merely rename NAEL: it combined NAEL's functions with some functions previously held by the regional consortia and local authority partnerships, and some previously delivered by the Welsh Government itself. Its remit is to design and deliver professional learning and leadership support at national level in response to changing practitioner and Welsh Government needs.

Three practical consequences for anyone pursuing headship in Wales:

  • NPQH in Wales has been delivered by Dysgu since September 2025. Enquiries and applications route through Dysgu rather than NAEL, and older NAEL-branded guidance you find online may be out of date on process even where it remains accurate on substance.
  • The consolidation is real, not cosmetic. Functions previously spread across NAEL, four regional consortia, local authority partnerships and the Welsh Government have been pulled into one body. If you have been told conflicting things by a consortium and a national body in the past, that fragmentation is what Dysgu was created to fix.
  • The funding is bigger, not smaller. NAEL's allocation in 2024-25, its last full year, was £1.854 million. Dysgu's 2026-27 funding directly replaces that, with additional funding to reflect its enhanced role. This was a consolidation with money attached rather than a rationalisation.

Regional delivery has not disappeared. The regional education services — including CSC, EAS and GwE — remain involved in delivering the leadership programmes on the ground, and all activity is delivered in Welsh, English or bilingually.

The route to NPQH in Wales today

The Welsh pathway to headship is more prescribed than England's, and it has become more so.

1

Substantial whole-school leadership experience

Before either programme, you need genuine whole-school leadership responsibility — typically an assistant or deputy headship, or an equivalent leadership group post. In Wales the leadership group has four statutory members: headteacher, deputy headteacher, assistant headteacher and, since March 2026, ALN coordinator. All four are paid from the L1–L43 leadership spine.

2

The National Aspiring Headteacher Development Programme

A one-year programme for experienced school leaders who want to become headteachers in the near future, requiring the equivalent of five days between January and December and often delivered through a blended model. Each candidate gets a Leadership Coach and membership of a peer group. It is delivered by the regional consortia and their partners, including local authorities, in Welsh, English or bilingually.

Completion is described in Welsh guidance as an expectation for all future NPQH applicants, and consortia material is blunter: NPQH assessment is only available following completion of this programme. Wales previously ran an assessment-only NPQH route for candidates who wanted to bypass developmental support. That route has been closed, which is a deliberate tightening of the pathway rather than an administrative change.

Welsh cohorts: cohort 1 commenced January 2025, cohort 2 in September 2025, and cohort 3 in September 2026 with 72 participant places.

3

NPQH itself — 18 months with Dysgu

The Welsh NPQH runs over 18 months. It begins with a 360-degree assessment, and comprises workshops, visits with a Leadership Coach, three residential elements and elective modules tailored to the participant's own development needs. A National Programme Director oversees quality and ensures the programme addresses both participant needs and national school system needs. Participants are awarded NPQH status on successful completion.

The redesign — following a Welsh Government review of NPQH in Wales — put improved learner outcomes at the centre, alongside leadership opportunities and exposure to different contexts, peer discussion and case study work, training in management responsibility, and continuous feedback.

4

Apply for headship

With NPQH in hand, EWC registration current and QTS held, you meet the statutory conditions in regulations 3, 4 and 5. Everything after that is an ordinary competitive appointment process run by the governing body, with the pay range set under paragraph 9 of the STPC(W)D within the school's headteacher group.

Eligibility: who can even apply

Welsh NPQH eligibility is notably tighter than England's, and it filters on intent as well as experience. Published criteria require applicants to be:

  • Registered teachers with the Education Workforce Council for Wales. Not merely QTS-holding — on the Welsh register.
  • Experienced practitioners with significant experience of leadership at a whole-school level. Departmental or phase leadership alone is not the target.
  • Planning to move into headship within 12 months. This is the striking one. Welsh NPQH is not a general professional development opportunity for anyone curious about leadership — it is a pre-appointment programme for people about to apply for headships.
  • Willing to share their learning and development with officers and colleagues. A system-contribution expectation rather than a purely individual qualification.

That twelve-month intent criterion is a genuine philosophical difference from England, where NPQH sits in a suite of qualifications that a teacher may take at a point in their career that suits them, sometimes years before a headship application and sometimes with no intention of headship at all. Wales treats NPQH as the last step before the job.

Application windows are fixed and national rather than rolling — associated NPQH Wales assessment and panel applications carried a deadline of 26 January 2026 at 4pm, for example. If you are planning around a Welsh headship, the window matters as much as the eligibility, and missing one can cost a year.

What the qualification gates in pay terms

It is worth being concrete about what is on the other side of this legal gate, because the requirement is the price of entry to the highest-paid role in Welsh state education.

Welsh headteacher pay is set within one of eight group ranges under paragraph 5.3 of the STPC(W)D, with the group determined by the school's unit total. Across all eight groups, the ranges run from £59,597 at the bottom of group 1 to £146,313 at the top of group 8 in the confirmed September 2025 document — roughly £61,683 to £151,434 after the 3.5% award for September 2026. Paragraph 9.3 permits a range exceeding the group maximum in defined circumstances, capped at 25% above it other than in exceptional cases requiring external independent advice and a business case.

So NPQH in Wales gates access to a statutory pay band with a ceiling around £151,434 before any above-maximum provision. Our Welsh leadership pay spine page sets out all eight group ranges, the unit-total formula that decides which one applies, and the progression assumption in paragraph 11.2(b) that makes movement up the spine a statutory default.

One further Welsh feature worth flagging: because Wales has no academies, there is no Welsh equivalent of the executive leadership tier that produces England's highest school salaries. The ceiling described above is, effectively, the ceiling for school leadership in Wales. Our academy trust CEO pay guide covers the English structure that has no Welsh counterpart.

Acting headship: the gap in the gate

Regulation 6 excludes acting head teachers from the qualification requirement, and this is more consequential than it first appears.

It means a Welsh school facing a sudden vacancy can appoint a deputy to act up without waiting eighteen months for them to complete NPQH — which is obviously necessary, since the alternative would be schools without heads. But it also creates a real career route: a senior leader can hold an acting headship, do the job, and go into their NPQH and subsequent substantive application with direct evidence of having done it. Given that Welsh NPQH eligibility asks for significant whole-school leadership experience and an intention to move into headship within twelve months, an acting headship is close to an ideal qualifying experience.

Two practical points follow. First, read Welsh headship adverts carefully: "acting", "interim" and "temporary" posts are not subject to the same legal precondition as substantive permanent ones, so an advert that seems surprisingly open about qualifications may be an acting post. Second, if you take an acting headship in Wales without NPQH, understand clearly that it does not convert into eligibility for the substantive post — you will still need the qualification before a permanent appointment, and you should be planning your NPQH application during the acting period rather than after it.

Acting headship also has a pay dimension. Paragraph 23 of the STPC(W)D provides for acting allowances where a teacher carries out the duties of a headteacher, deputy or assistant head, and paragraph 51.4(a) disapplies the specified working hours provisions from teachers in receipt of such an allowance — so an acting head moves onto leaders' working-time conditions for the duration.

What this means if you're moving from England

  • Your English NPQH is within the scope of regulation 3, which accepts the equivalent qualification in England, Scotland or Northern Ireland. Confirm your specific position with the appointing local authority before you apply.
  • But the two qualifications have diverged for fourteen years. England's NPQH has been voluntary, provider-delivered and repeatedly reformed since 2012; Wales's has been mandatory, nationally delivered and redesigned around Welsh policy. Expect a Welsh governing body to probe your familiarity with the Curriculum for Wales, the ALN framework and Welsh-medium provision.
  • You will need EWC registration under regulation 5 — a requirement with no English equivalent, since England has maintained no teacher register since 2012.
  • Welsh-medium capability is a material career variable. Wales has a persistent shortage of teachers and leaders able to work through the medium of Welsh, and it is a recurring theme in IWPRB evidence. It is worth more in the Welsh labour market than any pay table will show you.
  • Your pension is unaffected. The Teachers' Pension Scheme covers England and Wales as one scheme, so a cross-border move does not interrupt, transfer or alter your membership.
  • The pay structure you are moving into is tighter. Welsh headteacher pay is a range within a statutory group derived from a unit formula, with deputies, assistant heads and ALNCos all capped by the same group maximum. It is considerably less discretionary than what you are leaving.

Does the requirement work?

The honest answer is that nobody has published the evidence to settle it, and the arguments on each side are both serious.

Against. A mandatory qualification restricts the candidate pool by construction. Wales, like every UK nation, has had difficulty recruiting headteachers — acutely so in small rural primaries and in Welsh-medium schools, where the eligible pool is already narrow before a qualification requirement is applied on top. An 18-month programme with a national application window, taken only by people intending headship within twelve months, is a substantial commitment to make before you have a job offer. And a requirement that excludes acting heads is arguably acknowledging its own impracticality at the point it bites hardest.

For. A mandatory qualification guarantees a floor. Every Welsh head has been through the same preparation, been assessed against the same standard, and had a Leadership Coach and three residentials' worth of exposure to other schools before taking the job. A governing body appointing a head has a defined threshold to work from rather than a set of impressions from an interview day. It also makes the preparation a national asset — the aspiring programme and NPQH together create a visible cohort of leadership-ready people that the system can see and plan around, which a market of voluntary qualifications does not.

What we can say is what Wales has actually done when the question came up. The Welsh Government commissioned a review of NPQH in Wales, and the response was to redesign the qualification — around improved learner outcomes, contextual exposure, peer discussion and continuous feedback — and to tighten the pathway by closing the assessment-only route and making the aspiring programme a prerequisite. At no point was the requirement itself relaxed. Whatever the merits, the settled Welsh position is clearly that the qualification should be better, not optional.

What we could not verify

A November 2026 NPQH cohort. We looked specifically for one and could not confirm it. What the published Welsh material does show is cohort 3 commencing in September 2026, with 72 participant places on the National Aspiring Headteacher Development Programme, following cohort 1 in January 2025 and cohort 2 in September 2025. There was also a linked NPQH Wales assessment and panel application deadline of 26 January 2026. It is entirely possible that a specific assessment or programme element falls in November 2026, but we have not seen it stated and we are not going to publish a date we cannot source. Check directly with Dysgu for the current cohort calendar before planning around any date on this page.

The current fee position and funding for candidates. We have not found a clear published statement of what, if anything, a Welsh NPQH participant or their school pays, or how that compares with England's NPQ funding arrangements. Ask Dysgu and your local authority.

The requirement's effect on headship vacancies. No published evaluation quantifies whether the mandatory qualification helps or hinders headteacher recruitment in Wales. It is the obvious empirical question and we could not answer it.

Sources

Frequently asked questions

Is NPQH legally required to be a headteacher in Wales? +

Yes, for newly appointed permanent headteachers. The Head Teachers' Qualifications and Registration (Wales) Regulations 2005 — Welsh Statutory Instrument 2005/1227 (W.85), which came into force on 1 September 2005 — require a person appointed as a head teacher after that date to hold the National Professional Qualification for Headship in Wales, or the equivalent qualification from England, Scotland or Northern Ireland, or a qualification recognised as having equivalent effect. Welsh Government guidance on Hwb states the position plainly: in Wales it is a statutory requirement for all newly appointed permanent headteachers to hold the NPQH. This is a legal requirement in the ordinary sense — a condition on the appointment, not a preference expressed by governing bodies.

Is NPQH legally required in England? +

No. It was, briefly, and then it wasn't. The Education (Head Teachers' Qualifications) (England) Regulations 2003 made NPQH mandatory for first-time heads of maintained and non-maintained special schools in England from 1 April 2004. Those regulations were revoked by the Education (Head Teachers' Qualifications) (England) (Revocation) Regulations 2012, which came into force on 8 February 2012 following the review announced in the November 2010 Schools White Paper. The stated rationale was to transfer to schools the decision about what qualifications a prospective head should hold, in line with a wider policy of school autonomy. Since then NPQH in England has been strongly expected in practice and required by nothing.

So did the requirement start in 2004 or 2005 in Wales? +

Both dates are real and they refer to different things, which is why you will see the requirement described either way. NPQH became mandatory across England and Wales from 1 April 2004 under the England-titled 2003 regulations, which then extended in their application. Wales subsequently made its own instrument: the Head Teachers' Qualifications and Registration (Wales) Regulations 2005, commencing 1 September 2005, which requires those appointed as head teacher on or after that date to hold the NPQH in Wales or an equivalent. So the mandate dates from 2004; the Welsh instrument currently creating it dates from 2005. The important point is not the year but the divergence: England abandoned the requirement in 2012 and Wales did not.

What is Dysgu and what happened to NAEL? +

Dysgu is the national professional learning and leadership body for maintained schools and settings in Wales, operational from 1 September 2025. It replaced the National Academy for Educational Leadership (NAEL), absorbing NAEL's functions together with some functions previously held by the regional consortia and local authority partnerships and some previously delivered by the Welsh Government itself. Practically, for anyone pursuing headship: NPQH in Wales has been delivered by Dysgu since September 2025, and Dysgu is now the national body designing and delivering professional learning and leadership support. In funding terms, NAEL's allocation in 2024-25 — its last full year of operation — was £1.854 million, and Dysgu's 2026-27 funding directly replaces that, with additional funding reflecting its enlarged remit.

Do I have to do the National Aspiring Headteacher Development Programme first? +

In practice yes, and that is a change from how NPQH Wales previously worked. The programme is a one-year opportunity for experienced school leaders intending to move into headship in the near future, requiring the equivalent of five days between January and December, with each candidate allocated a Leadership Coach and a peer group. Welsh guidance describes completion as an expectation for all future NPQH applicants, and regional consortia material states that NPQH assessment is only available following completion of the National Aspiring Headteacher Development Programme — Preparing for NPQH. Wales previously ran an assessment-only NPQH route that bypassed developmental support; that route has been closed.

What does the Welsh NPQH programme actually involve? +

The current Welsh NPQH runs over 18 months and is built around development rather than assessment alone. It includes workshops, visits with a Leadership Coach, three residential elements and elective modules tailored to individual development needs, with a 360-degree assessment at the outset and a National Programme Director overseeing quality. Participants are awarded NPQH status on successful completion. All activity across the Welsh leadership programmes is delivered in Welsh, English or bilingually. That is a noticeably different shape from England's NPQH, which the DfE describes as taking between 12 and 22 months and which is delivered by approved providers as one of a suite of National Professional Qualifications.

Does the requirement apply to acting headteachers? +

No, and this is a real and deliberate gap in the gate. Regulation 6 of the 2005 Regulations excludes acting head teachers from the qualification requirement. That matters practically because it means a Welsh school can appoint an unqualified-for-headship senior leader to an acting headship — which is often exactly the experience that makes a subsequent NPQH application credible. It also means that reading a Welsh headship vacancy carefully matters: an acting or interim post is not subject to the same legal precondition as a substantive permanent one.

I hold an English NPQH. Can I apply for headships in Wales? +

On the face of the regulations, yes. Regulation 3 accepts the National Professional Qualification for Headship in Wales, the equivalent qualification in England, Scotland or Northern Ireland, or a qualification recognised as having equivalent effect. So an English NPQH is within the scope of the Welsh requirement as drafted. Two caveats worth taking seriously: the English and Welsh qualifications have diverged substantially in content and delivery since 2012, so a Welsh governing body may reasonably want to see evidence of familiarity with the Welsh curriculum, the ALN framework and Welsh-medium provision alongside the certificate; and you must in any event register with the Education Workforce Council to teach in Wales. Confirm your specific position with the appointing local authority before applying, not after.

Is this requirement a barrier to filling Welsh headships? +

It is the obvious objection, and we will not pretend to resolve it. A mandatory qualification restricts the pool of eligible candidates by definition, and Wales — like every UK nation — has faced difficulty recruiting headteachers, particularly in Welsh-medium schools and small rural primaries. The counter-argument is that the requirement raises the floor, guarantees a shared preparation, and gives a governing body a defined standard rather than a set of impressions. The Welsh Government commissioned a review of NPQH in Wales and redesigned the programme around improved learner outcomes rather than abolishing the requirement, which suggests the settled Welsh view is that the qualification should be better rather than optional. We have found no published evaluation quantifying the requirement's effect on headship vacancy rates, and we are not going to estimate one.

Related guides