Pension

Teacher AVCs Explained

How AVCs work for teachers — the Prudential scheme, net pay tax relief, access from 55, and how they compare to Additional Pension and a SIPP.

TP TeacherPay Updated 18 September 2026 19 min read

Independent guidance, not affiliated with the DfE, Teachers' Pensions or any teaching union.

Short answer

An Additional Voluntary Contribution arrangement is a defined contribution pot that sits alongside your Teachers' Pension rather than inside it — fundamentally different from the guaranteed, index-linked scheme benefits you already have. Contributions are deducted from salary before tax, so relief comes at your marginal rate automatically through payroll. The appointed provider is Prudential, named in the 1989 regulations that created the arrangement, though Teachers' Pensions is clear that the Department for Education has arrangements with Prudential and you can use other companies. The main reason a teacher wants one is access: an AVC can be taken from 55, rising to 57 on 6 April 2028, and Teachers' Pensions confirms payment of AVC benefits is not linked to payment of your Teachers' Pension. That makes it the only one of the four main top-up routes that can fund an early exit without touching your scheme pension. Against a SIPP its edge is narrow — payroll-based marginal-rate relief with nothing to reclaim — and on charges and investment choice a modern SIPP will usually win.
Free tool Check your Annual Allowance headroom See whether extra pension saving could push you over the allowance before you pay in.

What an AVC actually is — and is not

Almost every misunderstanding about teachers' AVCs comes from one place: people assume that because the money goes through the school payroll and has "teachers' pension" in the name, it must behave like the Teachers' Pension Scheme. It does not. It behaves like a personal pension that happens to be collected by your employer.

Your Teachers' Pension

A defined benefit promise. A formula is applied to your service and your salary, and the result is an annual income guaranteed for life, increased each year in line with inflation, carrying survivor benefits, backed by government. Markets cannot reduce it. You cannot outlive it. You carry no investment risk of any kind.

Your AVC

A defined contribution pot. Money is invested in funds you choose, and what you end up with depends on how much went in, how long it was invested, how those funds performed, what charges were taken and when you take the money out. Prudential states plainly that the value of your investment can go down as well as up so you might not get back the amount you put in.

Teachers' Pensions itself draws the line clearly, describing an AVC as building up an additional pension that is separate to your teacher's pension. That separateness is not a drawback. It is the entire reason the arrangement is useful, because it gives you something the scheme cannot: money you control, available on your timetable rather than the scheme's.

What it is not, and this is worth stating flatly, is a way of buying more Teachers' Pension. If you want more guaranteed, index-linked scheme income, the AVC is the wrong instrument — Additional Pension and Faster Accrual do that, and the comparison below explains when each makes sense.

Who runs the teachers' AVC

The arrangement is unusually long-established. The Teachers' Superannuation (Additional Voluntary Contributions) Regulations 1989 were made on 6 June 1989 and came into force on 1 July 1989, and they name the provider directly in the definitions: "the Company" means The Prudential Assurance Company Limited. That is still the underlying insurer today, now operating under the M&G group branding.

Since 1989

Prudential has been the appointed Teachers' AVC provider since the regulations came into force on 1 July 1989

Teachers' Pensions' own description is worth reading closely, because it contains an important piece of freedom that many teachers do not realise they have: "The Department for Education has arrangements with Prudential but you can use other companies."

You are not locked into the appointed provider

That single sentence is the reason the SIPP comparison later on this page is a real comparison rather than an academic one. You can pay into the Prudential arrangement through payroll, or you can pay into a pension of your own choosing — a personal pension, a stakeholder pension or a SIPP — and get tax relief a different way. A Free Standing AVC is the historic name for an arrangement with a provider other than the scheme's own.

What changes between the two routes is not whether you get relief but how, and what it costs you in charges and admin. Those are the two questions the rest of this page is really about.

How contributions work

The mechanics are simple and this is genuinely the AVC's strongest practical feature.

  • Deducted from salary before tax. Prudential's key features document states that payments are deducted from your salary and passed to Prudential to be invested, and that because they are deducted before tax you qualify for immediate tax relief on your payments if you normally pay tax.
  • Regular or one-off. You can pay monthly, yearly, or make a single payment, and Prudential also accepts lump sum payments by cheque.
  • Percentage or fixed amount. Contributions can be set as a proportion of pay or as a flat monthly figure, and changed as your circumstances change.
  • Invested in funds you choose. Payments into unit-linked funds buy units in those funds; there is also a With-Profits option with its own distinct characteristics and charges.

One exception on tax relief: lump sums paid by cheque

The automatic payroll relief only applies to contributions that actually go through payroll. Prudential is explicit that if you make a lump sum payment by cheque, you will need to reclaim any tax relief you are due by contacting HMRC yourself. That turns the AVC's main advantage — relief with nothing to reclaim — into exactly the same admin job a SIPP would give you. If you are making one-off contributions rather than regular ones, the payroll advantage largely disappears.

How much you can pay in

Prudential states there is no limit to the amount you can pay into the AVC scheme itself. The real constraints are three, and they come from tax law and from payroll rather than from the arrangement:

  • Tax relief is capped at 100% of your UK relevant earnings. Prudential puts it as the maximum tax relief across this AVC, the main Teachers' Pension Scheme and any other pensions being limited to 100% of your salary.
  • The Annual Allowance applies across everything. For 2026/27 it is £60,000, and it covers your AVC contributions plus the growth in your Teachers' Pension for the year. A teacher with a large Pension Input Amount from a promotion can find AVC contributions pushing them over a limit they did not know they were near.
  • Payroll can only take what is there. The practical ceiling is your pensionable pay after National Insurance and your main Teachers' Pension contribution have already come out.

The real reason to hold one: access

If there is one argument for a teacher holding an AVC rather than simply paying more into the scheme, this is it, and everything else is secondary.

Teachers' Pensions answers the question directly in its own FAQ, and the wording is unambiguous: "Payment of your teachers' AVC benefits is not linked to payment of your pension from Teachers' Pensions. You could access your teachers' AVC at any time from age 55."

Consider what that makes possible. A teacher with a career average Normal Pension Age of 67 or 68 who wants to stop at 60 faces a large actuarial reduction on their scheme pension — our guide to early retirement reduction factors sets out how large. An AVC pot can fund the years between stopping work and taking the scheme pension, letting the scheme benefits stay untouched and unreduced until later. That is a genuinely different financial shape from anything the scheme's own flexibilities can produce.

55 → 57

Normal minimum pension age, rising on 6 April 2028 under the Finance Act 2022

Two things Teachers' Pensions' own page does not tell you

First, 55 is not a permanent number. Section 10 of the Finance Act 2022 raises the normal minimum pension age to 57 from 6 April 2028, subject to protected pension ages. Teachers' Pensions' AVC page still says you could access your AVC at any time from age 55 and does not flag the change. Prudential's own literature does flag it. If your plan depends on drawing an AVC at 55 or 56 after April 2028, that plan needs checking.

Second, "any time" can be expensive. The AVC has its own AVC Normal Pension Age, and Prudential warns that if benefits are taken at any time other than that date or on death, a Market Value Reduction may apply to money taken out of the With-Profits Fund. So access is legally independent of the scheme but can carry a cost depending on where your money is invested. Check which funds you hold before assuming the flexibility is free.

Taking the money

Because an AVC is a defined contribution arrangement, the pension freedoms apply to it in a way they emphatically do not apply to the Teachers' Pension Scheme — which pays only pension commencement lump sums and trivial commutation lump sums, as our guide to lump sums and commutation explains.

Up to 25% is normally available tax-free. Since 6 April 2024 the limit on that is the Lump Sum Allowance of £268,275, with the Lump Sum and Death Benefit Allowance of £1,073,100 sitting above it. HMRC's mechanism is that the tax-free amount is the lower of the applicable amount — broadly 25% — the available Lump Sum Allowance, and the available Lump Sum and Death Benefit Allowance.

The allowances are shared, not per-scheme

This matters for teachers with a large scheme pension. The tax-free lump sum you take from the Teachers' Pension Scheme uses up Lump Sum Allowance, and what it uses is then not available for the AVC. A long-serving leader taking a substantial scheme lump sum and then drawing a large AVC needs to add the two together rather than treating each as having its own 25%. For most teachers there is comfortable headroom, but it is an addition worth doing rather than assuming.

The four-way comparison

Teachers thinking about topping up their pension generally face four options, and they are presented as though they were four versions of the same thing. They are not. Two of them buy guaranteed scheme pension and two of them build an investment pot, and that division matters far more than any difference within each pair.

OptionWhat it isWhat you getWhen you can take itWho carries the risk
AVC Defined contribution pot An investment pot whose value depends on contributions, time and market returns From 55, rising to 57 on 6 April 2028 — independent of your TPS Normal Pension Age You carry all the investment risk
Additional Pension Defined benefit purchase A stated amount of extra annual TPS pension, in multiples of £250 Paid with your TPS benefits, at your Normal Pension Age (reduced if taken early) None — the amount is guaranteed and index-linked
Faster Accrual Defined benefit purchase A better build-up rate for one scheme year — 1/55th, 1/50th or 1/45th instead of 1/57th Paid with your TPS benefits, at your Normal Pension Age (reduced if taken early) None — but the amount bought depends on that year's salary
External SIPP Defined contribution pot An investment pot, with a wider choice of investments and providers From 55, rising to 57 on 6 April 2028 — fully independent of the TPS You carry all the investment risk

The division that actually matters

Additional Pension and Faster Accrual are salary-linked defined benefit purchases. You hand over contributions and the scheme owes you a specific, guaranteed, index-linked amount of extra annual pension, payable at your Normal Pension Age with survivor benefits attached. There is no investment risk and no way to access it early without the scheme's ordinary actuarial reduction.

The AVC and a SIPP are genuine pots. You own an investment, its value fluctuates, and you decide when and how to take it from the normal minimum pension age onwards, entirely independently of the scheme.

Once you see it that way, the question stops being "which top-up is best value" and becomes "do I want more guaranteed income at Normal Pension Age, or do I want capital I control before then?" Those are different objectives and the answer is often to hold some of each.

Additional Pension, briefly

Because it sits in the comparison, the essentials: Additional Pension buys a stated amount of extra annual Teachers' Pension in multiples of £250, payable by lump sum or by monthly instalments over a maximum period of twenty years which must complete before your Normal Pension Age. There is a cap on the total that can be bought, which Teachers' Pensions uprates annually — for the 2026/27 scheme year the maximum in the career average scheme is £8,900, up from £8,600 the year before, applying from 1 April 2026.

One genuinely useful feature: you can elect for the Additional Pension to carry family benefits, so that 50% of the annual amount is paid as part of a surviving adult pension on your death, at a premium in the cost. That is an option an AVC does not replicate in the same way, and it matters for members with dependants — see our guide to Teachers' Pension death benefits for how survivor benefits work more generally.

You cannot convert an AVC into Additional Pension

Teachers' Pensions is explicit on this: it is not possible to purchase Additional Pension in the Teachers' Pension Scheme with funds accrued under either an AVC or a Free Standing AVC arrangement. There is no bridge between the two worlds. Money that goes into the pot stays in the pot, and a teacher who builds an AVC intending to convert it into guaranteed scheme pension later will find they cannot. If guaranteed pension is the goal, buy guaranteed pension.

AVC against a SIPP

Since both are defined contribution pots, and since Teachers' Pensions explicitly permits using other companies, this is a real choice rather than a theoretical one. The honest verdict is that the AVC's advantage is narrower than it is usually presented, and it lives almost entirely in the tax relief mechanism.

The tax relief difference, precisely

HMRC's Pensions Tax Manual describes the two systems clearly, and the difference is worth understanding rather than glossing.

  • Net pay arrangement — what the AVC uses. Your employer deducts the contribution from your gross pay before income tax is calculated on the balance. HMRC says this enables the member to receive tax relief at their marginal rate. A higher-rate taxpayer contributing £100 sees £100 go into the pension and their taxable pay fall by £100, giving 40% relief immediately. Nothing is reclaimed, nothing is delayed.
  • Relief at source — what a SIPP uses. You pay from taxed income, the provider claims basic-rate relief from HMRC and adds it to your pot, and a higher-rate or additional-rate taxpayer has to claim the balance separately. The extra relief comes back to you as a tax reduction rather than going into the pension.

Note also that you do not get to choose: HMRC states that a member cannot choose which method of tax relief applies to their contributions, because it is determined by the method the scheme is allowed to operate.

Where the AVC wins

Simplicity of relief. Full marginal-rate relief arrives automatically through payroll with nothing to claim, no forms, and no waiting. For a higher-rate taxpayer who does not otherwise complete a tax return, that is a real convenience. Contributions are also automatic once set up, which for many people is the difference between saving and intending to save.

Where a SIPP usually wins

Charges and choice. A modern low-cost SIPP typically offers a far wider fund range and lower total costs than a legacy insured arrangement — and Prudential itself states that charges for the AVC plan may be higher than for a stakeholder pension. A SIPP is also portable and independent of your employer's payroll, so it survives a move between schools, sectors or out of teaching altogether.

A refinement on claiming higher-rate relief

The old objection to relief at source — that you must file a Self Assessment tax return to get higher-rate relief — is no longer strictly true. GOV.UK now directs people who do not file a return to an online claim service for pension tax relief. So the SIPP admin burden is smaller than it was, which narrows the AVC's advantage further.

Net pay does have one known weakness in the other direction, affecting very low earners whose pay is below the personal allowance and who therefore get no relief under net pay when they would have got basic-rate relief under relief at source. A statutory top-up exists for this, and the rules governing it were substantially rewritten with effect from July 2026 so that the test compares relief actually received under net pay against relief at source rather than simply looking at whether income is below the personal allowance. It is unlikely to affect a full-time teacher but can affect very part-time staff.

AVC against Faster Accrual and Additional Pension

This is the more consequential comparison for most teachers, because it is a choice between different kinds of thing rather than between two versions of the same thing.

Faster Accrual improves the rate at which one scheme year builds up, from 1/57th to 1/55th, 1/50th or 1/45th, and is elected one year at a time by 31 March. Our guide to Buy Out and Faster Accrual covers the pricing and the mechanics in full, including why the three rates are priced on an identical actuarial basis. We will not repeat that here. What matters for this comparison is what Faster Accrual cannot do.

1

If your plan is to work to Normal Pension Age

The defined benefit options are generally the stronger choice. Faster Accrual and Additional Pension give you guaranteed, index-linked income with survivor benefits and no investment risk, and they pay out at exactly the point your plan calls for the money. An AVC would be taking on market risk to achieve something the scheme will do for you with certainty.

2

If your plan is to stop well before Normal Pension Age

The AVC is the option that actually addresses the problem. Extra scheme pension bought through Faster Accrual or Additional Pension is payable at your Normal Pension Age and reduced if you take it earlier — so buying more of it does not help you leave early; it simply gives you more of a thing you will take a reduction on.

An AVC pot drawn from 55, or 57 from April 2028, can cover the years between stopping and claiming, leaving your scheme benefits to be taken later at a smaller reduction or none at all. That is a structurally different solution and nothing else on the list provides it.

3

If you are unsure — which is most people

Holding both is entirely legitimate and often sensible. There is no rule against paying Additional Pension or Faster Accrual and an AVC in the same year, subject to the Annual Allowance across everything. Guaranteed income at Normal Pension Age and accessible capital before it are complementary, not competing.

The one thing not to do is build an AVC intending to convert it into scheme pension later, because that conversion does not exist.

Charges, honestly

We would like to give you a single figure for what the teachers' AVC costs. We cannot, and we would rather explain why than publish a number we could not verify.

Prudential's key features document describes the charging structure without quantifying it: "For unit-linked funds, we deduct an Annual Management Charge from the funds and this charge is calculated daily and taken monthly from your plan by cancelling units. The amount of charge we deduct depends on the funds you choose to invest in and the amount of your original investment." It directs members to the Fund Guide for the actual percentages, and adds that in addition to its charges there may be further costs incurred, which can vary over time.

What is published and quotable:

  • With-Profits Fund: the charge is currently expected to be approximately 0.76% a year if the investment return in the fund is 5% a year gross of tax.
  • With-Profits guarantee charge: for applications received on or after 15 March 2019, the total deduction for the guarantee charge over the lifetime of the plan is not currently more than 4% of any payment from the fund.
  • Prudential's own comparison: "Charges for the plan may be higher than for a stakeholder pension."

Take that last line seriously

A provider stating in its own key features document that its charges may be higher than a stakeholder pension is telling you something important. Stakeholder pensions are capped at a relatively modest annual charge, and a competitive modern SIPP will typically undercut both. Over a twenty or thirty-year contribution period, a difference of half a percentage point a year compounds into a materially smaller pot.

This does not mean the AVC is a bad product — the payroll relief and the automatic contribution have real value, and for many teachers the alternative is not a cheaper SIPP but no saving at all. It does mean that the charge comparison is a question you should actually ask, using the current Fund Guide for the funds you would actually hold, rather than assuming the scheme's appointed provider must be competitive because it is the scheme's appointed provider.

Death benefits and life cover

Two features here, one of which is genuinely useful and one of which needs thought.

On death before taking the AVC, Prudential's key features document says that if you die and you still have money in your AVC, it will normally pay the value of it as a lump sum, and that this will be paid to your estate. Lump sum death benefits are not normally subject to income tax unless they exceed the available Lump Sum and Death Benefit Allowance, are paid more than two years after notification of death, or death occurred after age 75.

Payment to the estate is worth thinking about

Many modern pension death benefits are paid at the provider's discretion, which typically keeps them outside the estate. Payment to the estate is a different arrangement and generally a less efficient one for inheritance tax purposes. For a small pot it will rarely matter. For a substantial one it is a question worth raising with a regulated adviser, alongside how your Teachers' Pension death grant nomination is set up — the two are separate and are dealt with by different organisations.

Life cover inside the AVC is an option many teachers do not know exists: Prudential's material states that you can use AVCs to provide optional life cover for yourself, your spouse or any dependants. Whether that is good value compared with ordinary term assurance is a question for an adviser, but it is a genuine feature, and it is worth knowing about particularly for anyone who has opted out of the scheme and lost the in-service death grant.

The Annual Allowance traps

Because AVC contributions and Teachers' Pension growth are added together for Annual Allowance purposes, an AVC can push a teacher over a limit they were nowhere near on the scheme alone.

  • The standard Annual Allowance for 2026/27 is £60,000, covering your Pension Input Amount from the Teachers' Pension Scheme plus everything paid into the AVC.
  • Tapering applies to high earners. For 2026/27 the threshold income figure is £200,000 and adjusted income £260,000, with the tapered allowance falling to a minimum of £10,000. Very few classroom teachers are affected; some leaders with additional income are.
  • The Money Purchase Annual Allowance is £10,000. This is the one that catches people. If you flexibly access a defined contribution pot — including taking your AVC flexibly rather than as a simple lump sum and annuity — the amount you can subsequently put into money purchase arrangements drops to £10,000 a year.

The MPAA trap for a teacher still working

Consider a teacher who takes their AVC flexibly at 57 to fund reduced hours, then continues teaching part-time for several years. Triggering the Money Purchase Annual Allowance limits future money purchase contributions to £10,000 a year. It does not restrict the defined benefit accrual in the Teachers' Pension Scheme itself, but an alternative annual allowance applies to that. If your plan involves drawing the AVC and continuing to save, get advice on the order of operations before you touch the pot — the sequencing is reversible before you start and not afterwards.

Our Annual Allowance guide explains how the charge is calculated and what Scheme Pays does if you owe one.

Who an AVC actually suits

  • The teacher planning to stop before Normal Pension Age. This is the core case and the one the AVC is genuinely good at. Building a pot to bridge the years between stopping and claiming lets your scheme pension be taken later at a smaller reduction, and no other top-up route does this.
  • The higher-rate taxpayer who wants relief without admin. Net pay gives full marginal-rate relief through payroll with nothing to reclaim. If that convenience is what keeps you contributing, it is worth real money.
  • The teacher who wants flexibility the scheme cannot offer. The Teachers' Pension Scheme pays only pension commencement and trivial commutation lump sums — no drawdown, no flexible withdrawal. If that matters to you, a pot is the answer, not more scheme pension.
  • The teacher near the Additional Pension cap. There is a maximum on extra scheme pension that can be bought. Once you are at it, an AVC or SIPP is the only remaining route.
  • Probably not the teacher who wants certainty. If what you actually want is a larger guaranteed income at Normal Pension Age, Additional Pension and Faster Accrual give you exactly that with no investment risk. Taking market risk to reach a destination the scheme will take you to with certainty is a poor trade.
  • Probably not the teacher who would be better off with a cheap SIPP, if charges matter more to them than payroll convenience — and Prudential's own warning that charges may be higher than a stakeholder pension means that comparison deserves making rather than assuming.
  • Nobody should decide this from a general guide. The interaction between an AVC, the Annual Allowance, the Lump Sum Allowance, your retirement date and your marginal tax rate in retirement is exactly the kind of thing regulated advice exists for, and nothing on this page is advice.

The summary worth leaving with is that the four options are usually presented as a menu of ways to get more pension, when in fact only two of them do that and the other two do something else entirely. Additional Pension and Faster Accrual buy certainty at a fixed date. An AVC and a SIPP buy control over timing at the cost of certainty. Deciding which of those you actually want is the whole decision; everything else is detail.

Frequently asked questions

What is a teachers' AVC and how is it different from my Teachers' Pension? +

An Additional Voluntary Contribution arrangement is a defined contribution pension pot that sits alongside your Teachers' Pension rather than inside it. Your main Teachers' Pension is a defined benefit promise — a formula applied to your service and salary, guaranteed and index-linked, with the government carrying the risk. An AVC is a pot of money invested in funds you choose, where the value can go down as well as up and you carry all the risk. Teachers' Pensions describes it as building up an additional pension that is separate to your teacher's pension, and that separation is the whole point of it.

Who is the AVC provider for teachers? +

Prudential — specifically The Prudential Assurance Company Limited, now part of M&G — which has been the appointed provider since the Teachers' Superannuation (Additional Voluntary Contributions) Regulations 1989 came into force on 1 July 1989 and named the company directly. Teachers' Pensions' own wording is careful, though: the Department for Education has arrangements with Prudential, but you can use other companies. You are not obliged to use the appointed provider.

What is the main advantage of an AVC over Faster Accrual? +

Access. An AVC can be taken from age 55, rising to 57 from 6 April 2028, and Teachers' Pensions confirms that payment of your teachers' AVC benefits is not linked to payment of your pension from Teachers' Pensions. Faster Accrual buys extra Teachers' Pension, which is payable at your Normal Pension Age — 67 or 68 for most current teachers — and is actuarially reduced if you take it earlier. If your plan is to stop teaching in your late fifties, an AVC can fund the gap without touching your scheme pension, and Faster Accrual cannot.

What is the advantage of an AVC over a SIPP? +

Mainly the tax relief mechanism, and it is a genuine but narrow advantage. AVC contributions are deducted from your salary before tax under a net pay arrangement, so you receive full relief at your marginal rate immediately through payroll with nothing to reclaim. A SIPP uses relief at source: basic rate relief is added automatically, but a higher-rate taxpayer has to claim the extra separately from HMRC. For a higher-rate taxpayer who would rather not deal with that, payroll simplicity is worth something. On investment choice and charges, a modern low-cost SIPP will usually win.

Can I pay into an AVC and Additional Pension at the same time? +

Yes — they are entirely separate arrangements and holding one does not prevent the other. What you cannot do is convert between them. Teachers' Pensions is explicit that it is not possible to purchase Additional Pension in the Teachers' Pension Scheme with funds accrued under either an AVC or a Free Standing AVC arrangement. So money that goes into the AVC pot stays in the pot; it cannot later be turned into guaranteed scheme pension.

How much can I pay into an AVC? +

Prudential states there is no limit to the amount you can pay into the AVC scheme itself. The limits that bite are tax limits: tax relief is capped at 100% of your UK relevant earnings, and the Annual Allowance — £60,000 for 2026/27 — applies to your AVC contributions and your Teachers' Pension growth added together. There is also a practical payroll ceiling, since contributions come out of pay after National Insurance and your main Teachers' Pension contribution have already been taken.

When can I take my AVC? +

From the normal minimum pension age, which is currently 55 and rises to 57 on 6 April 2028 under section 10 of the Finance Act 2022, unless you have a protected pension age. Note that Teachers' Pensions' own AVC page still says you could access your AVC at any time from age 55 without flagging the 2028 change, so do not plan around that page alone. A separate watch-out: the AVC has its own AVC Normal Pension Age, and Prudential warns that taking money from its With-Profits Fund at any time other than that date or on death may attract a Market Value Reduction.

How much of my AVC is tax-free? +

Usually up to 25%, subject to the allowances that replaced the Lifetime Allowance in April 2024. The tax-free amount is the lower of the applicable amount — broadly 25% — your available Lump Sum Allowance of £268,275, and your available Lump Sum and Death Benefit Allowance of £1,073,100. Both allowances are shared across all your pensions, so tax-free cash taken from the Teachers' Pension Scheme uses up allowance that is then not available for the AVC.

What happens to my AVC if I die before taking it? +

Prudential's key features document says that if you die with money still in your AVC, it will normally pay the value of it as a lump sum to your estate. That is worth noting carefully, because paying to the estate is generally less efficient for inheritance tax than a death benefit paid at a provider's discretion. It is also separate from and additional to the Teachers' Pension Scheme death grant. Anyone with a substantial AVC pot and estate planning concerns should take advice on how it is set up rather than assuming it works like the scheme death grant.

What does an AVC cost in charges? +

Prudential does not publish a single headline figure, because the annual management charge depends on the funds you choose and the amount invested — the percentages are in the Teachers' AVC Fund Guide rather than the key features document. What is published: the With-Profits Fund charge is expected to be approximately 0.76% a year assuming a 5% gross investment return, a separate guarantee charge on that fund is not currently expected to exceed 4% of any payment over the lifetime of the plan, and Prudential itself states that charges for the plan may be higher than for a stakeholder pension. That last sentence is the provider's own warning and is worth taking seriously.

Related guides